Most well established large organizations suffer from some level of "Web
sprawl." It organically grows for the same reasons as a disparate systems
environment:
Mergers and acquisitions Legacy architecture now deprecated Tactical
solutions circumventing architectural goals Disparate IT skill sets Lack of
architecture steering COTS package purchases provide heterogeneous platforms
and functional overlaps No centralized IT, i.e., different IT organizations
across business units The list could continue. By the same token the
enterprise architecture team is tasked with reigning in Web sprawl and
stemming its propagation.
Fighting Web sprawl within a large organization is an uphill battle.
Experiencing this on a daily basis has shown me that there are some things
you can do to help alleviate the issues. It is popular (and rightly so) to
have a target unified portal frame... (more)
A lot has been written on the approach to service-oriented architecture (SOA)
migration. Although they are referred to by many names, there is the
strategic approach, which is of high quality and so is also costly and
initially less responsive because of the analysis involved up front. Then
there is the organic growth approach, in which services are developed on an
as-needed basis within the context of projects, which is responsive, but
leads to redundancy and the lack of vision leads to unmanageability later.
Finally, there is the hybrid approach, which attempts to take the best... (more)